<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:r="https://r-universe.dev"><channel><title>jpenn2023.r-universe.dev</title><link>https://jpenn2023.r-universe.dev</link><description>Recent package updates in jpenn2023</description><generator>R-universe</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 19:59:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>[jpenn2023] budgetIVr 0.1.0</title><author>jordan.penn5841@gmail.com (Jordan Penn)</author><description>A tuneable and interpretable method for relaxing the
instrumental variables (IV) assumptions to infer treatment
effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. For a
treatment-associated covariate to be a valid IV, it must be (a)
unconfounded with the outcome and (b) have a causal effect on
the outcome that is exclusively mediated by the exposure. There
is no general test of the validity of these IV assumptions for
any particular pre-treatment covariate. However, if different
pre-treatment covariates give differing causal effect estimates
when treated as IVs, then we know at least some of the
covariates violate these assumptions. 'budgetIVr' exploits this
fact by taking as input a minimum budget of pre-treatment
covariates assumed to be valid IVs and idenfiying the set of
causal effects that are consistent with the user's data and
budget assumption. The following generalizations of this
principle can be used in this package: (1) a vector of multiple
budgets can be assigned alongside corresponding thresholds that
model degrees of IV invalidity; (2) budgets and thresholds can
be chosen using specialist knowledge or varied in a principled
sensitivity analysis; (3) treatment effects can be nonlinear
and/or depend on multiple exposures (at a computational cost).
The methods in this package require only summary statistics.
Confidence sets are constructed under the &quot;no measurement
error&quot; (NOME) assumption from the Mendelian randomization
literature. For further methodological details, please refer to
Penn et al. (2024) &lt;doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.06913&gt;.</description><link>https://github.com/r-universe/jpenn2023/actions/runs/29236272598</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 19:59:51 GMT</pubDate><r:package>budgetIVr</r:package><r:version>0.1.0</r:version><r:status>success</r:status><r:repository>https://jpenn2023.r-universe.dev</r:repository><r:upstream>https://github.com/jpenn2023/budgetivr</r:upstream></item></channel></rss>